I have decided to post before reading anyone else’s postings because last time I became so enthralled in everyone else’s thoughts, I couldn’t fixate on my own interpretation. Sooo, if I repeat anything already mentioned, I apologize.
Throughout The Lathe of Heaven, it was sometimes difficult to keep track of all the different changed “realities.” For instance, towards the end I was confused about why the gray people disappeared, but the aliens didn’t. Or why some gray people remained, but for the most part all of the aliens were left untouched by “The Break.” I really don’t understand the significance. And if Haber and Orr could always remember the outcomes of the effective dreams, why was Heather so oblivious to it after another reality shift? She was physically present for two or three, so wouldn’t she at least remember those instances? If Haber could remember all of them, even after Orr effectively dreamed without him (in the cabin) then why couldn’t Heather? This doesn’t have anything to do with analyzing the postmodern relevance of the novel, but I was certainly left confused over these issues.
I also found the whole symbolism of the “onion” when describing Dr. Haber’s personality could also be applied to the book as well. The entire plot structure was layered, each dream pealing off… or rather adding on an additional layer to the already stacked storyline. A never-ending onion where it’s never exactly clear where the center is or how things truly began. Did Orr really start having his “effective dreams” when the world came to an end, or is that simply when he became aware that he was changing reality? Perhaps one of his dreams brought the world to an end, he just doesn’t remember. Ah, again, the postmodern theme of untruth. There is no true reality. None of the characters could offer trustworthy perspective on how things were literally supposed to be. I was also thinking about how the only way this book could work is through the science fiction genre. The author herself is creating an alternate reality by writing in the future, redesigning the world and the state of the country. The framework of Orr’s constant reality-shifting is based on a futuristic/unknown reality which itself is yet another layer, another transformation of the reader’s reality.
I also couldn’t figure out why the description of Heather was so over-the-top, emphasizing her harsh exterior, comparing her to a black widow. (But then her name was Heather, which bugggged me!) Orr liked her so he unconsciously changed her into someone more gentle and soft? Therefore he too used his dreams to make life better for himself and wasn’t all the time impartial to the personal results of the dreaming? Haber’s description was likewise exaggerated to portray a large, husky, overbearing individual. However Haber nor Heather have any of the actual power. Heather is helpless with the law. Haber is incompetent when left to his own effective dreaming. The only character with any control and power is the scrawny, small guy. Another level to the nothing-is-as-it-seems symbolism running through the novel. Nothing is true. Etc.