{"id":124,"date":"2005-10-25T06:01:05","date_gmt":"2005-10-25T10:01:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/10\/25\/the-nervous-system\/"},"modified":"2005-10-25T06:06:39","modified_gmt":"2005-10-25T10:06:39","slug":"the-nervous-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/10\/25\/the-nervous-system\/","title":{"rendered":"The Nervous System"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&rsquo;s interesting that Benjamin&rsquo;s essay attempts to be positive about the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, but it reads so negatively.&nbsp; Is that because we&rsquo;ve all become a little jaded about how &lsquo;the film&rsquo; (which we now know includes commercial television) works?&nbsp; While it may destroy the commanding aura of the original and elite object, I think we&rsquo;ve all come to understand that it effectively creates its own aura as well.&nbsp; Any good Marxist knows that commodities are fetishized by the dissociation of use-value and exchange-value, and that the laborer is alienated by the separation of one&rsquo;s labor from the object one creates by the fact that one is paid in dollar bills.&nbsp; Obviously the next step in the triumph of capitalism is to make impossible the tactile relationship one might have with the fetishized object; the object is an image.&nbsp; Benjamin sets up the actor-in-the-room and actor-on-the-screen binary in order to suggest that the film audience can somehow become more critical because of the actor&rsquo;s absence, but it seems that the &lsquo;shock effect&rsquo; of the camera&rsquo;s work is more open to the inflated, uncritical, desirous gaping that accompanies the image of &ldquo;breasts in a clinging sweater or the naked torso of the athletic hero&rdquo; in Adorno and Horkheimer&rsquo;s culture industry essay.&nbsp; What&rsquo;s even more scarifying &ndash; and yet something that we as a filmic culture have accepted with amazing pluck and aplomb &ndash; is that the system of reproducible images has changed the very way we perceive.&nbsp; Benjamin&rsquo;s thesis rests on a crucial &lsquo;should be,&rsquo; when he states that &ldquo;the shock effect of the film [&hellip;] should be cushioned by heightened presence of mind&rdquo; (238).&nbsp; Even with his allowances for the intellectual laziness of the masses, Benjamin&rsquo;s perspective on &lsquo;distraction&rsquo; as a means toward critical perception sounds rather&hellip;I&rsquo;m sorry&hellip;I got distracted by the cheerleaders on Monday Night Football&hellip;where was I going with this?<\/p>\n<p>Note: This post was written before I was able to read any of the other posts, and so I&nbsp;didn&#8217;t realize that most of the class&nbsp;read Benjamin as being <strong>negative<\/strong> about film and reproducible images &#8212; and that there would be such a rousing defense of film.&nbsp; I guess&nbsp;we&#8217;ll probably start with this discrepancy&nbsp;in our class discussion tonight.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&rsquo;s interesting that Benjamin&rsquo;s essay attempts to be positive about the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, but it reads so negatively.&nbsp; Is that because we&rsquo;ve all become a little jaded about how &lsquo;the film&rsquo; (which we now know includes commercial television) works?&nbsp; While it may destroy the commanding aura of the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/10\/25\/the-nervous-system\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Nervous System<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reflections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}