{"id":133,"date":"2005-11-01T07:13:13","date_gmt":"2005-11-01T11:13:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/11\/01\/intertextuality\/"},"modified":"2005-11-01T07:13:13","modified_gmt":"2005-11-01T11:13:13","slug":"intertextuality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/11\/01\/intertextuality\/","title":{"rendered":"Intertextuality"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Most of the time, my first reaction when I read these books is to look at the formal constructs the authors use to frame their stories. As a writer, that&#8217;s how I&#8217;ve been trained, and those types of critiques tend to come more easily to me than many of the things we end up discussing in class as lynchpin elements of a text. So I apologize if this isn&#8217;t necessarily on topic, but as I read through <em>Dream Jungle<\/em> I was continually impressed with how Jessica Hagedorn handled the varying intertextual constructs within the book. <\/p>\n<p>Many times, these types of fictional elements (excerpts from Pigafetta&#8217;s journey&#8217;s with Magellan, interview transcripts of discussions, a courier-fonted excerpts of Pilar&#8217;s memoir, footnoted excerpts, etc.) can have a counteractive quality that disrupts the reader more then enriches the text, and that didn&#8217;t happen here. Though the content bears almost no resemblance, I kept seeing the same authorial instincts to use these constructs as Michael Dorris and Louise Erdrich used in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/reader\/0060931655\/ref=sib_dp_pop_ex\/002-1098626-1290409?%5Fencoding=UTF8&#038;p=S00H#reader-link\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Crown of Columbus<\/em><\/a>, where intertextual references play a large part in establishing a fictional &quot;history&quot;, but establish also a depth the to story instead of highlighting surface aspects. I keep thinking of why these elements worked so well, and I think it may be the double-culture revelry that the books share. <em>Dream Jungle<\/em> does deal directly with American pop culture, but not exclusively, which adds a certain cultural weight to the &quot;bells and whistles.&quot; In <em>Dream Jungle<\/em>, somehow they work to achieve a distinct &quot;history&quot; to the fictional elements to the text that worked along with historical characterizations of place, such as the characterization of the Philippines throughout. Books built around intertextual meta-elements that deal solely in discussing American pop culture (anything by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/reader\/0316925195\/ref=sib_dp_pop_ex\/002-1098626-1290409?%5Fencoding=UTF8&#038;p=S00F#reader-page\" target=\"_blank\">David Foster Wallace<\/a>, really) tend to have the hurdle of reader alienation to deal with, and I think it may have to deal with the nature of our pop culture&#8217;s inability in many instances to look past its own influence (which Wallace once wrote an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/reader\/0316925284\/002-3959404-2454411?v=search-inside&#038;keywords=reader%20alienation\" target=\"_blank\">essay<\/a> about, ironically), which can cause self-reflexive aggravation in readers when authors revel in it. Hagedorn in her books finds a way to dodge that trap by pitting American pop culture against a staid history, and I think that may be what I responded to most here. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most of the time, my first reaction when I read these books is to look at the formal constructs the authors use to frame their stories. As a writer, that&#8217;s how I&#8217;ve been trained, and those types of critiques tend to come more easily to me than many of the things we end up discussing &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/11\/01\/intertextuality\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Intertextuality<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reflections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}