{"id":80,"date":"2005-09-27T02:19:49","date_gmt":"2005-09-27T06:19:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/09\/27\/time-and-place-in-memento\/"},"modified":"2005-09-27T02:19:49","modified_gmt":"2005-09-27T06:19:49","slug":"time-and-place-in-memento","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/09\/27\/time-and-place-in-memento\/","title":{"rendered":"Time and Place In <ITAL>Memento<\/ITAL>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What struck me most about re-watching <em>Memento<\/em> this week <strike>(besides the fact that I found I disliked the movie much less than I initially did when I saw it a couple years ago, when I wrote it off as pretentious and gimmicky)<\/strike>, were the structural similarities to <em>Lot 49<\/em>. Both stories find their arcs within what are basically splices of their character&rsquo;s lives, and end with the effect of an ellipses. With Oedipa it&rsquo;s at the auction, and we as readers are unsure of the validity of the Trystero situation, but we do know now that it&rsquo;s Oedipa&rsquo;s to maybe endlessly decipher. <em>Memento<\/em>&rsquo;s treatment of Leonard&rsquo;s re-definition of his own meaning (&ldquo;you can be my John G.,&rdquo; etc.) is handled more self-effacingly, in that he knows and acknowledges the fundamental flaw then chooses to wipe it away, but we&rsquo;re left with the notion that his work will never be done. I&rsquo;ve been thinking about it, and I may be off-base here, but if it weren&rsquo;t for Nolan&rsquo;s choice to merely chronicle one of the many, many detective searches by Leonard, he may not have been able to succeed in using a backwards-told storyline. What the splice effect does is remove the expectation of a finite solution, in which the actual search slowly begins to take a decided backdrop (when the black and white portion bleeds into color) to the truth behind his condition, and the characters actions in relation to it. I&rsquo;m still trying to work this one out. <\/p>\n<p> I also thought Nolan&rsquo;s choice to install a sense of placelessness to the whole thing was interesting. We only get place-related history in two ways. &ldquo;I&rsquo;m Leonard Shelby from San Francisco,&rdquo; and license plates to automobiles, which leads me to believe that it was set in California, but we can&rsquo;t be sure. As opposed to other notable noir films like <em>L.A. Confidential<\/em>, <em>Bound<\/em>, and <em>Chinatown<\/em>, which were so rooted in place that the setting very quickly became a character, the setting in Memento is drab, forgettable, and unstylized. I keep thinking how the story would be different if it were set in Paul Auster&rsquo;s New York, or James Ellroy&rsquo;s Los Angeles. It then would have been more of an obstacle for Leonard in a way that the nameless place Nolan chose wasn&rsquo;t, and in a way erasing that prospect allowed for the storyline to be essentially a one-man character study (Teddy, Natalie, and even Sammy Jankis are arguably two-dimensional characters). So far, the texts that we&rsquo;ve read have had a strong sense of place that often colored their outcomes, but is this placelessness something born of postmodernity? The idea that &ldquo;this story could happen anywhere&rdquo; applies also to the DeLillo story we read early on in the course, and I&rsquo;m wondering how it relates. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What struck me most about re-watching Memento this week (besides the fact that I found I disliked the movie much less than I initially did when I saw it a couple years ago, when I wrote it off as pretentious and gimmicky), were the structural similarities to Lot 49. Both stories find their arcs within &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/09\/27\/time-and-place-in-memento\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Time and Place In <ITAL>Memento<\/ITAL><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reflections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}