{"id":86,"date":"2005-10-02T22:37:03","date_gmt":"2005-10-03T02:37:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/10\/02\/400-words-of-nothing\/"},"modified":"2005-10-03T18:33:10","modified_gmt":"2005-10-03T22:33:10","slug":"400-words-of-nothing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/10\/02\/400-words-of-nothing\/","title":{"rendered":"400 words of nothing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font>I have been waiting for some time to post, as I did not want the first response to <u>The Female Man<\/u> to be the voice of a male, but as I have another paper to write, here I go!<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font>I am having a difficult time providing a coherent critical response for a couple of reasons.&nbsp; First, this is hardly a subtle piece that warrants a nuanced reaction.&nbsp; Rather, it is the pummeling of a blunt instrument over the collective heads of a patriarchal society.&nbsp; What could I (a bumbling bag of testosterone) possibly have to add, critique or question?&nbsp; It seems to me that this text is structured so as to make my voice irrelevant (and I assume that is the point).&nbsp; My ethos has been stripped and I shall gladly defer any further conversation to the voices this novel purports to represent.&nbsp; (I am not sure who this is, as the question of gender was so thoroughly troubled by the characters that populated Manland and Whileaway that it moves beyond the simple label of &ldquo;woman&rdquo; let alone &ldquo;feminist.&rdquo;) <\/font><\/p>\n<p><font><\/font><font><\/font><font>Unfortunately, as I have little to add to the discussion of the text, I had hoped to address Harraway&rsquo;s seminal text, &ldquo;A Cyborg Manifesto.&rdquo;&nbsp; However, once again, I have hit a wall.&nbsp; Her text is so dense and meandering that I really don&rsquo;t know where to begin.&nbsp; I have yet to engage in a conversation or sit through a conference presentation that did not essentialize her text in one way or another.<\/font>&nbsp; <font><\/font><font>In fact, her neo-Marxist critique (the central thrust of the entire essay) always seems to be overshadowed by discussions of baboon hearts and breast implants.<br \/><\/font><font><\/font><font>&nbsp;<br \/><\/font><font><\/font><font>So, rather than attempting to engage two impenetrable texts with a 300-word response, I will attempt to spark a discussion with reflexive moment.&nbsp; It seems to me that what we have here is the nominalistic representation that I was blathering on about while we were discussing Whitehead&rsquo;s text.&nbsp; It troubles me that, when I am presented with it, I have very little to say.&nbsp; Is it that I rely so heavily on essentialist representations that these texts have left me befuddled?&nbsp; Is the reason that the first response to a text that we have had two weeks to read is being posted the night before the final day is that we all are encountering a similar problem?&nbsp; These two texts address a central problem in our society, a problem that I care quite a bit about, and yet I have written 400-words of incoherent, inconsequential ramblings.&nbsp; <br \/><\/font><font><\/font><font>&nbsp;<br \/><\/font>Is it good that I am speechless?&nbsp;&nbsp;Or more to the point, does this void provide space for an otherwise marginalized (yet, not essentialized) group so that they may have a voice?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have been waiting for some time to post, as I did not want the first response to The Female Man to be the voice of a male, but as I have another paper to write, here I go! I am having a difficult time providing a coherent critical response for a couple of reasons.&nbsp; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/2005\/10\/02\/400-words-of-nothing\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">400 words of nothing<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reflections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/fall2005\/660\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}