{"id":273,"date":"2009-02-17T23:19:42","date_gmt":"2009-02-18T04:19:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/?p=273"},"modified":"2009-02-17T23:19:42","modified_gmt":"2009-02-18T04:19:42","slug":"the-art-of-simulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/?p=273","title":{"rendered":"The Art of Simulation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I decided to compose my blog post this week after having read the introduction to Danielewski&#8217;s <em>House of Leaves<\/em> and before continuing through the rest of the book:<\/p>\n<p>So what\u00a0 are we to make of Danielewski&#8217;s introduction?\u00a0 I&#8217;m not exactly sure, but neither is Mr. Johnny Truant.<\/p>\n<p>First, we have what appears to be a frame narrative of sorts (or perhaps this is merely an introduction; I don&#8217;t know if the book returns to the point of view of Johnny Truant). Nevertheless, we have a narrator addressing the writing that follows him.<\/p>\n<p>So what does this supposed <em>framing<\/em> establish?\u00a0 Very little&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m kidding of course&#8230;or am I?\u00a0 If one thing is for certain of the words of Truant, it is that nothing is for certain (or real for that matter?)&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Now, surely we have all encountered the frame narrative used in it&#8217;s classical form one time or another: William Chaucer&#8217;s <em>Canterbury Tales<\/em>, <em>One Thousand and One Nights<\/em>, or Joseph Conrad&#8217;s <em>Heart of Darkness<\/em>.\u00a0 Perhaps what all these <em>frames<\/em> have in common is their establishment of incentive for the reader.\u00a0 What do I mean?\u00a0 In each of these examples, the reader is given a reason to enter through the frame and into the heart of the text:\u00a0 Chaucer&#8217;s prologue establishes the pilgrimage, its travelers\/storytellers, and a reason to read through their various stories: to find out who gets the free dinner!\u00a0 In <em>One Thousand and One Nights<\/em>, the reader is encouraged to find out if Scheherazade&#8217;s storytelling can save the day!<\/p>\n<p>But in the introduction to <em>House of Leaves<\/em>, the reader is left to question: Does any of this matter?\u00a0 Why should we read on if <em>The<\/em> <em>Navidson Record<\/em> is fake?\u00a0 But in rebuttle, Johnny Truant asks the reader: should it matter if it doesn&#8217;t matter?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;See, the irony is it makes no difference that the documentary at the heart of this book is fiction.\u00a0 Zampano knew from the get go that what&#8217;s real or isn&#8217;t real doesn&#8217;t matter here.\u00a0 The consequences are the same.&#8221; (Danielewski xx)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Johnny Truant, Zampano (and more generally Danielewski) are calling into question the relevancy of reality, of <em>Truth<\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;They say truth stands the test of time.\u00a0 I can think of no greater comfort than knowing this document failed such a test.&#8221; (xix)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As readers, we buy into the &#8216;reality&#8217; of a story.\u00a0 <em>Heart of Darkness <\/em>is a piece of fiction; its frame narrative is a piece of fiction that &#8216;sets up&#8217; another piece of fiction&#8230;and yet we accept the &#8216;reality&#8217; of the characters.\u00a0 At times, we sympathize with Marlow, but we also criticize his actions.\u00a0 We are confused, fascinated, and appalled by Kurtz.\u00a0 We root for the cannibals&#8230;(just me? okay).\u00a0 We do all of these things as if Marlow, Kurtz, and the cannibals were actually &#8216;real&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>Through this introduction, Danielewski questions the <em>simulation <\/em>that is art, and our role in this simulation as readers. Should I continue through the rest of <em>House of Leaves<\/em>?\u00a0 Should I continue to read what I know is &#8216;fake&#8217;?\u00a0 Of course, because the &#8220;consequences are the same.&#8221;\u00a0 The difference between <em>Heart of Darkness <\/em>and <em>House of Leaves<\/em>?\u00a0 The latter is self-aware of its role as fiction, as simulation.\u00a0 This is not to say that Joseph Conrad and his readers (or any author\/reader for that matter) are unable to distinguish between their lives and the literature they read; but rather, it&#8217;s writers like Danielewski and Luigi Pirandello, or directors like Jean-Luc Godard, Francois Truffaut, and Robert Altman who are willing to play with these conventions and incorporate these self-reflexive elements.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I decided to compose my blog post this week after having read the introduction to Danielewski&#8217;s House of Leaves and before continuing through the rest of the book: So what\u00a0 are we to make of Danielewski&#8217;s introduction?\u00a0 I&#8217;m not exactly sure, but neither is Mr. Johnny Truant. First, we have what appears to be a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/?p=273\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Art of Simulation<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[39,40,32,35,41,36],"class_list":["post-273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-week-5-mzd","tag-danielewski","tag-frame-narrative","tag-house-of-leaves","tag-reality","tag-self-reflexivity","tag-simulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=273"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":282,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273\/revisions\/282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}