\u201cI like stuff that isn\u2019t the same every time you look at it\u201d (spoken by Carly in \u201cSome Zombie Contingency Plans\u201d): It seems that this observation sums up a primary characteristic of postmodern literature and rhetoric, one which is evident in most of the short stories and passages assigned this week.<\/p>\n
I enjoyed the short stories, particularly the pieces by Foer, Lethem, and Link. Foer\u2019s piece was especially moving because it recounts experiences and emotions that are common to the human experience, yet are usually unexpressed. I wonder whether these emotions are untold because language as we know it fails to convey them, or because these emotions are not necessarily meant <\/em>to be expressed, and should simply lurk in a person\u2019s mind until other emotions take their place? Either way, Foer\u2019s use of symbols and characters in place of incommunicable emotions effectively illustrates that language is significantly less sophisticated than we may think. Foer\u2019s piece also displays another recognizable characteristic of postmodern texts: its focus on signifiers and the absence of a constant \u201csignified.\u201d If I understand it correctly, this characteristic resonates with Carly’s statement. Foer shows that though these symbols encapsulate unspoken emotions, these emotions are dependent on specific circumstances. Therefore, their meanings are fluid, changing every time they\u2019re felt in a different context.<\/p>\n Link\u2019s piece, \u201cSome Zombie Contingency Plan,\u201d does not have the easiest plot to follow, but it is enjoyable nonetheless. I\u2019m not usually a fan of fantasy fiction, but I enjoy stories that have enigmatic and thought-provoking metaphors intertwined in the text. In response to Jennifer\u2019s earlier post, I think the zombie metaphor is one that concerns the ambiguity and fluidity of identity. The main characters, Soap and Carly, repeatedly camouflage and change their identity throughout the story. Though Soap constantly presents the hypothetical situation of zombies invading as a fear-inducing scenario, I think Link wants the reader to think of Soap as a potential zombie, in a metaphorical sense. In other words, maybe Link is making the point that metaphorical zombies\u2014individuals who are not necessarily dead on the outside, but are void on the inside\u2014are to be feared more than the actual, fictional zombies. While attempting to escape from an \u201cactual\u201d zombie is certainly frightening, Link hints that individuals who themselves morph into metaphorical zombies can find no escape route (you cannot escape from yourself). Again, the postmodern statement above about things appearing differently in various situations also fits this storyline. The indistinctness of the characters\u2019 backgrounds and personalities as well as the overall elusiveness of the plot collectively point to this postmodern notion of perpetual ambiguity and malleability of meaning within the text.<\/p>\n Finally, I found Cage\u2019s \u201cDiary: How to Improve the World (You Will Only Make Matters Worse)\u201d an engaging piece to read as well. Though I found it initially difficult to immediately identify the theme or purpose of the piece, I was able to deduce a pattern in the text after a second read. Obviously, the structure of the piece is meant to be avant-garde, in order to capture the reader\u2019s attention or unsettle the reader in some way. The title\u2019s ironic humor has significant bearing on the meaning of the piece as a whole (I think): it seems that Cage is implying that human intervention\u2014any attempts by humans to \u201cimprove the world\u201d\u2014usually fail and result in the opposite. Aside from technological advances, which are acclaimed in this piece (\u201cSuccess for humanity lies in technology\u2026), almost all other human attempts to change the world are useless or harmful. Among many other themes that I couldn\u2019t decipher, Cage calls for the removal of government and politics (anarchy), the eradication of environmental pollutants, and the obliteration of \u201carthritic\u201d language that is structured and lacks fluidity. Though no one can deny that there are meaningful messages within this text, they are still open for interpretation.<\/p>\n With Cage\u2019s text as well as all the others assigned, the meaning of the text is never the same every time you read it. This indeterminacy is what makes postmodern, avant-garde texts unique\u2014if they do nothing else, they will NOT fail to make you think<\/em>. When the reader is given a chance to think, the result will likely be fruitful change. As Hassan points out in \u201cPOSTmodernism,\u201d \u201cWhat the avant-garde probably still needs to do for a time is serve as the agent of change, which is recognizable when still newer change is in progress.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u201cI like stuff that isn\u2019t the same every time you look at it\u201d (spoken by Carly in \u201cSome Zombie Contingency Plans\u201d): It seems that this observation sums up a primary characteristic of postmodern literature and rhetoric, one which is evident in most of the short stories and passages assigned this week. I enjoyed the short … Continue reading \u201cI like stuff that isn\u2019t the same every time you look at it”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[22,19,30,29,13],"class_list":["post-31","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-week-2-short-stories","tag-humor","tag-lethem","tag-signified","tag-signifier","tag-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions\/34"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}