{"id":394,"date":"2009-03-16T23:20:30","date_gmt":"2009-03-17T04:20:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/?p=394"},"modified":"2009-03-24T07:13:14","modified_gmt":"2009-03-24T12:13:14","slug":"transitioning-from-danielewski-to-russ","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/?p=394","title":{"rendered":"Transitioning from Danielewski to Russ"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So, I&#8217;m relaxing over spring break, recovering from the marathon that was Danielewski&#8217;s <em>House of Leaves <\/em>(thoroughly enjoyed nonetheless), and I start in on Joanna Russ&#8217; <em>The Female Man<\/em>.\u00a0 After having finished the novel (shall we call it a novel?) a week later, I reflect.\u00a0 At times I thought the book was brilliant; the subversion of the science fiction, manipulating the genre to fit what she was trying to address on the feminist &#8216;front&#8217;, was outstanding.\u00a0 The Faulknerian use of stream of consciousness and first-person narration is also commendable.\u00a0 But then there were parts of the novel that became burdensome for me; in other words, at a certain point, I felt like the book&#8217;s entire discussion (the question of a woman&#8217;s role\/freedom\/right [I hesitate to provide a label for fear of a Jael-like counterattack] in the world) became repetitive; and I would guess if you go searching for criticism against <em>The Female Man<\/em> you might find a similar complaint somewhere&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;but really you don&#8217;t have to look any further than the book itself:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Shrill . . . vituperative . . . no concern for the future of society . . . maunderings of antiquated feminism . . . selfish femlib . . . need a good lay . . . this shapeless book . . . of course a calm and objective discussion is beyond . . . twisted, neurotic . . . some truth buried in a largely hysterical . . . [and so on and so forth]. (140-41)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em>Within<\/em><em> <\/em>the book, Joanna Russ has provided the reader with criticism <em>for <\/em>the book: <em>The Female Man <\/em>is its own worst critic.\u00a0 What does this tell us about Joanna Russ and her intentions?\u00a0 Is she mocking these critical voices; drawing attention to the very biases that they reinforce?\u00a0 Is this critical inclusion a form of self-deprecation of her novel?\u00a0 Is it a little bit of both?<\/p>\n<p>Whatever answers we might conclude to these questions, this section of the book got me thinking about Danielewski.\u00a0 Of course, after three weeks of <em>House of Leaves<\/em>, we are all familiar with Danielewski&#8217;s tactics, his self-proclaimed preemptive strike against any form of literary criticism, or any attempt to disassemble the book.\u00a0 I&#8217;m not necessarily suggesting that Joanna Russ was trying to actively prevent criticism like Danielewski is, but she is certainly anticipating responses towards the book.<\/p>\n<p>With <em>House of Leaves<\/em> already in the discussion, I also thought of another interesting comparison between the two authors.\u00a0 With the construction of numerous levels of &#8216;authorship&#8217; (i.e. Zampano and Johnny Truant), Danielewski effectively &#8216;distances&#8217; himself from the text.\u00a0 Conversely, Joanna Russ eliminates any separation between her and <em>The Female Man <\/em>by identifying herself in the book as both character and author, crossing the conventional line between author and text.\u00a0 I wonder what this accomplishes for the book.\u00a0 As the &#8216;1970s feminist trying to succeed in a man&#8217;s world&#8217;, what can we say about <em>The Female Man <\/em>Joanna and the author Joanna?\u00a0 I&#8217;m thinking it&#8217;s important to remember that\u00a0 she is only one of the four female &#8216;representations&#8217; in the book.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;As you can tell, this book has left me with more questions than it has provided answers.<\/p>\n<p>Side-note:<\/p>\n<p>With all the references to the moon,\u00a0 it will be hard not to think of <em>The Female Man<\/em> whenever I listen to Pink Floyd&#8217;s &#8216;Dark Side of the Moon&#8217;.\u00a0 Now, I keep thinking of <a title=\"'Us and Them'\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=qBBRhmH4S8A\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Us and Them&#8217;<\/a> in terms of Jael&#8217;s version of Earth with warring male and female societies.\u00a0 Try it; it just about fits&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Dark-Side-Moon-Pink-Floyd\/dp\/B000002U82%3FSubscriptionId%3D02E5W5871AJF7PMMMS82%26tag%3Dsamplereality-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3DB000002U82\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ecx.images-amazon.com\/images\/I\/31ESVCFE0SL._SL160_.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, I&#8217;m relaxing over spring break, recovering from the marathon that was Danielewski&#8217;s House of Leaves (thoroughly enjoyed nonetheless), and I start in on Joanna Russ&#8217; The Female Man.\u00a0 After having finished the novel (shall we call it a novel?) a week later, I reflect.\u00a0 At times I thought the book was brilliant; the subversion &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/?p=394\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Transitioning from Danielewski to Russ<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[47,39,53,32,52,35,21,51],"class_list":["post-394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-week-9-female-man","tag-authorship","tag-danielewski","tag-feminism","tag-house-of-leaves","tag-joanna-russ","tag-reality","tag-science-fiction","tag-the-female-man"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/394"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=394"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/394\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":470,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/394\/revisions\/470"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}