{"id":696,"date":"2009-04-21T22:37:20","date_gmt":"2009-04-22T03:37:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/?p=696"},"modified":"2009-04-25T15:17:25","modified_gmt":"2009-04-25T20:17:25","slug":"the-writer-and-his-subjects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/?p=696","title":{"rendered":"The writer and his subjects"},"content":{"rendered":"

Wow. I had thought House of Leaves <\/em>took us on a whirlwind tour de force narrative, but I think Plascencia\u2019s People of Paper <\/em>has Danielewski\u2019s work beat. I have so many questions. I was really hooked by the Prologue and the first couple of chapters, but then found myself juggling so many narratives. Obviously there are connections between the narratives, but these connections are often vague, and I kept waiting to have some grand epiphany as to how all the puzzle pieces really come together.<\/p>\n

One of the main puzzle pieces I found myself working to place was the question of Saturn\u2019s identity. Initially, and at many points throughout the novel, it seems that Saturn is a God-figure. He\u2019s all-knowing, always watching the many characters. However, the characters are able to hide from him behind their lead walls and doors and by blocking out some of their thoughts from \u201cview.\u201d However, we also learn that \u201cSaturn\u2019s real name is Salvador Plascencia\u201d (102). Postcards sent to Saturn are addressed to Plascencia, and the two continue to be equated throughout the novel. We learn that Saturn\u2019s great-grandfather is Don Victoriano and his father is Antonio, providing more connections between the characters and suggesting that Saturn is not a God-figure. It also seems that Saturn is, at least at times, an actual neighbor in the town because Smiley watches \u201cthe light from Saturn\u2019s bedroom\u201d being turned on and off (151). Saturn\u2019s identity is clearly jumbled, but it seems that Saturn is most likely representative of the author and Plascencia is commenting on writing and the role of the writer.<\/p>\n

The town is at war against Saturn, a war which is later referred to as \u201cthe war on an omniscient narrator\u201d (218). At several points throughout the novel we learn that Saturn is losing some control over the story. Early in the novel he is said to be \u201cblind to the progression of the story\u201d (105). Later, Sandra shares that \u201cAfter all these pages, as Saturn faded, it was our voices that directed the story, our collective might pressing Saturn into a corner\u201d (216). At this point in the novel, the voices of the characters dominate the pages. Saturn is called a \u201ctyrant\u201d because he is \u201ccommanding the story where he wants it to go\u201d (228). The characters want privacy. They build their safe houses to protect themselves from Saturn\u2019s view. Even when the lead houses must be taken down, the characters are still able to withhold information from Saturn\u2014the author\u2014by withholding thoughts when telling their story. The clearest example of this withholding of information is when Froggy \u201cnever revealed what the letters [from Sandra] said\u201d (244). He viewed this withholding of information as \u201chis small way of triumphing over Saturn.\u201d In this sense, the character is withholding information from not only the author, who has not provided full disclosure of the character\u2019s thoughts, actions, and motivations, but also from the reader. Not all questions are answered, and some things have been left open to interpretation. The characters seem to prefer this \u201cprivacy\u201d to full disclosure. Little Merced even feels anger \u201cnot only toward Saturn, but also against those who stared down at the page, against those who followed sentences into her father\u2019s room and into his bed, watching [\u2026] perhaps even laughing\u201d (186). <\/span>It seems that Plascencia is making a statement about the writer\u2019s role, suggesting that not all questions should be answered but, rather, things should be left open to interpretation, just as they are in life.<\/p>\n

In this way, Plascencia also suggests, as Cameroon states, that we are \u201cnot of paper\u201d (226). Cameroon says that there is a difference between telling and writing. As both Cameroon and Liz point out, an author cannot capture the whole story when trying to portray a character or a person. Text, then, and the retelling of the stories on it, becomes dangerous, as Ralph and Elisa Landin conclude (219). It is interesting that Plascencia suggests that writers embark on a dangerous task when they write their stories, and yet his novel seems so personal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Wow. I had thought House of Leaves took us on a whirlwind tour de force narrative, but I think Plascencia\u2019s People of Paper has Danielewski\u2019s work beat. I have so many questions. I was really hooked by the Prologue and the first couple of chapters, but then found myself juggling so many narratives. Obviously there … Continue reading The writer and his subjects<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[39,32,97,87,88,96,65],"class_list":["post-696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-week-14-people-of-paper","tag-danielewski","tag-house-of-leaves","tag-lead","tag-people-of-paper","tag-salvador-plascencia","tag-saturn","tag-writers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/696"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=696"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/696\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":721,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/696\/revisions\/721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samplereality.com\/gmu\/spring2009\/660\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}