We talked some in class about the definitions of sympathy, empathy, and hyperempathy; however, we seemed to have avoided a discussion on the function of this “delusion,” in the novel. Whether or not Lauren’s condition is plausible or correctly labeled, I think the existence of the condition at all is extremely important. Could Butler have written the novel without the inclusion of Lauren’s hyperempathy? [Me thinks not.]
I understand that hyperempathy helps lend a supernatural effect to the novel, but even Butler describes the condition as a “delusion,” (an impression firmly maintained despite contradiction by reality) rather than an inexplicably, paranormally endowed character trait. So, the trait is wholly necessary to maintain genre; it is not simply a characteristic of the novel, but something more.
Parable of the Sower has subversive and obviously inclinations towards slave narratives, with Lauren as the principal oppressed force. While other characters wish to escape the harshness of the dystopian world they find themselves in, much like the African-American slaves of the American Pre-Civil War Era, Lauren’s freedom is not merely stifled by the ‘state of the world’. Being an empath, she is subject to a much more person, internal, and inescapable enslavement. In fact, her well-being, and for a time at the beginning of the novel it seems her ability to stay alive, hinges on the well-being of society. To ignore others’ peril is impossible for her, and as such it is equally important to her. Hyperempathy acts as a catalyst for Lauren to affect change in the world. Hyperempathy compels her to be compassionate to those around her (as we will see in later sections of the novel [her aid to fellow travelers]). Hyperempathy compels her to move north and strive to build a new community based on assisting and mutually serving others. While most characters in the novel attempt to help themselves and their immediate neighbors, i.e. setting up a singular safe community, Keith doing harm to others to save his family, Lauren must try to help everyone for to inflict harm on any and everyone else is to inflict harm upon herself. I think Butler is suggesting a form of living that we should all internalize, for if everyone in this dystopia counted on everyone else’s survival for their own, the unpleasant state of society could not even exist.
The trait IS NOT wholly necessary, rather.