It had been some time since I viewed this film; however, upon seeing it last week, I was struck by the same thought that occurred to me the first time I watched it: “Can a Hollywood film ever escape the 3 act structure?” How is it that a story told backwards adheres to a traditional narrative structure and character with no memory still manages a significant arc? It seems to me that with the incredibly experimental nature of contemporary novels, there should be some room for similar creativity in feature films. What we need is “Aqua Teen Hunger Force: The Movie.”
Kiraprater (sorry I had to use your handle, your identity is a mystery to me), I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss truth. In the universe of Memento, there are things that actually happen. For instance, the audience is well informed about the nature of Leonard and Natalie’s relationship. There is a “truth” that we witness, and then a false memory that is juxtaposed against it. I have trouble with the idea that Leonard’s “memories” are just as valid as the other characters. For one thing, it seems to undercut the premise of the entire film. You are absolutely right in the case of the scene you mention in your blog, Leonard is just as unreliable as Teddy; yet, I think this speaks to the unreliability of human perception (or memory if you would rather), not the absence of truth.
I am reminded of Jorge Luis Borges’s short fiction “The Library of Babel,” which describes a library (one that holds more book than there are atoms in the universe) that contains every conceivable variation of a book that is 410 pages in length. Therefore, this library holds every sentence that has ever or will ever be written. Therefore, it must contain, within its walls, the meaning of life and the answer to every question ever asked. However, for every book that holds an answer, there are millions of counterfeit books that are similar, but contain minor variations. Borges describes “librarians” who waste their lives searching through the volumes in the hope of finding meaning within the seemingly infinite number of book variations.
The reason I recounted this story was not to reach my 300-word minimum, but rather to argue that there is a truth, we just have no hope of ever knowing it. In the universe of the text, Leonard did, or did not kill his wife. There is an answer… a truth. Yet, the truth is lost in the fallibility of the human mind and unreliability of the signifying chain. Either way, I am sure it will lead to a good discussion in class.