Quick link: My trail
Raw link: http://trailfire.com/jpiszcz/trailview/65700
Quick link: My trail
Raw link: http://trailfire.com/jpiszcz/trailview/65700
I found the constant changing of screens first a bit irritating as I normally like to control the movement of the text as I read, not have it be changed automatically. Once I got into the gist of it and kept up reading quickly, it became easier to follow. Sometimes there are one-two shots where questions are posed or the story is split into two different pieces.
Perhaps I am reading too much into this slide but as soon as the background turned pale and I read desert, I thought of the background as a stand-like environment. This was probably a coincidence since the backgrounds do not change that often.
http://iat.ubalt.edu/moulthrop/hypertexts/hgs/HGS033.html
After reading this work for about 20-25 minutes and getting the gist of how it was going I then began to interact with it. After interacting with the text with the text for awhile, it became apparent, one can create a story based upon the four highlighted text words around the piece of text in the middle. Somehow, I got to an exit point, which is here:
http://iat.ubalt.edu/moulthrop/hypertexts/hgs/HGS144.html
This URL represents an escape from the work itself, and when one goes back to this page a few times, it appears some of the links still exist but they are hidden, so unless you mouse over them you cannot return; however, even when you exit from the work:
http://iat.ubalt.edu/moulthrop/hypertexts/hgs/HGSXX1.html
It still continues after about 30 seconds. Changing the URL a bit at the end, it reveals that HGS248 appears to be the last slide in the work itself:
http://iat.ubalt.edu/moulthrop/hypertexts/hgs/HGS248.html
From Queensland Studies Authority:
Literary vs. Non-Literary (PDF)
Raw link:
http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/assessment/qcar_ss_english_literary.pdf
Overall in comparison:
Jabberwocky relies on random moving bits of language and Orson Whales utilizes an animation-like presentation, both of which seem to be created to entertain or entice the user and try to make the user make sense of the work. However, if the user is not interested, he or she may not delve into it any further. In the assigned reading, it was noted that while electronic literature may be the new and next best thing compared to regular printer literature; it also noted that one must not become misguided in the “media” itself, otherwise the meaning is lost.
Representational meaning:
Firefly is contextually based like a book, the user interface is shaped like a novel and it has arrows to flip to the next page. There are clear instructions directly to the right on how to navigate the piece, giving the work a sense of direction that gives the user an idea of what to expect. While the work itself can express many stories depending upon on the selections of the user, the interface is somewhat normalized compared to Jabberwocky for example.
Evocative meaning:
When the user first loads the page they are presented with a nice daytime picture looking through the woods at a nice patch of grass. Soon thereafter, it becomes very dark and the title is displayed “A tale told in 180 degrees of separation.” The animation change from day to night could represent a degree of separation even before diving further into the content. The other question or detail I ponder is the “fog and green light,” is that represented by the ghostly green image backdrop throughout Firefly? It appears to be décor for the tale itself but is it supposed to represent something or someone? In the very first page that is loaded, the “green fog” appears on the right side. When the user moves to the next page, it is flipped to the left side as if one was looking at the “green fog” in a mirror. When you click to go to the next page, the fog is flipped to the left side. Is this intentional? Is there anything to be gleamed from the change of the fog backdrop throughout the tale and that it stays on the left side all the way to the end and does not change after the first page? The color also stood out to me, nearly all the text and components of the user-interface are some shade of green and “fog and green light” is also stated in the first part of the tale. What is the relationship between the color green with this author? Is there one? Even the text on the side of the page, which is the instructional text, not a part of the work, is also green.