Into the wild of Flickr

A) Uploaded March 24, 2006 by Stuart_aka_stu_macgoo

Inside the Microwave 2

A) Uploaded March 24, 2006 by Stuart_aka_stu_macgoo

“I opened the microwave, and the bottom of it was filled with rancid grease. Alex had been using it to cook chicken, and it never occurred to him that the grease had to drain somewhere. It wasn’t that he was too lazy to clean it up – Alex always kept things real neat and orderly – it was just that he hadn’t noticed the grease.” – Wayne Westerberg (63)

This is a photograph of a man with a surprised expression on his face as he looks into a microwave. I had found other images that actually displayed grease in the bottom of a microwave, but I thought it would be more interesting to focus on what Westerberg’s face might have looked like when he found the mess. I feel that this is an important scene to portray because it exhibit’s Alex’s lack of common sense. Westerberg’s astonishment that Alex – whom he thought of as hard working, clean, and intelligent – could be clumsy enough to not notice grease, solidifies the notion that Alex definitely had shortcomings.

canoe.jpg

Pam Climbs

B) Uploaded April 2, 2006 by Engineered Photography

“I though he’d be fine in the end. He was smart. He’d figured out how to paddle a canoe down to Mexico, how to hop freight trains, how to score a bed at inner-city missions. He figured all of that out on his own, and I felt sure he’d figure out Alaska too.” – Jan Burres (46)

This picture shows a woman being helped over a wall that is covered in advertisements in front of an empty canoe. I selected this image because the canoe and the wall with the names of corporations on it intrigued me. The caption lists many of the things that Alex did on his own as part of his adventure and rejection of societal superficialities. There is a rich amount of irony in the juxtaposition of this image and Jan Burres’ quote. The picture can be used to represent a rejection of commercial/capital life as it depicts a person climbing over a wall or obstacle adorned with commercial advertisements, which parallels Alex’s adventure and resentment. There is a definite dissonance between the image and text: Alex was insistent that he accomplish his adventure alone, the woman in the picture is receiving help from several people. Furthermore, Alex was set on using his canoe to find an opening to the ocean as part of his “mission,” the woman in the photograph has, ostensibly, abandoned her canoe and gotten help from people who are diverse enough that they could be a cross sectional representation of society. The message of this photo in alignment with this caption might be that Alex may have had more luck working with society than against it.

plain guitar.jpg

A-hole

C) Uploaded on March 31, 2006 by scienceduck

“Walt bought Billie a Gianni guitar, on which she strummed lullabies to soothe the fuzzy newborn. Twenty-two years later, rangers from the National Park Service would find that same guitar on the backseat of a yellow Datsun abandoned near the shore of Lake Mead” (106).

This is an image of the front of an acoustic guitar on a black background. I chose this picture because the guitar is a tangible and personal item that McCandless has had since birth and takes with him on his adventure. It connects his “normal” life, before he resented society and his family, to his outlandish journey. Obviously, Flickr has an astronomical amount of guitar pictures; I chose this one because it has a nebulous background, much like the life of McCandless’ guitar seemed to follow an uncertain path, as described in the caption. Additionally, the guitar is important because – more so than the guitar – it represents McCandless’ rejection of his former self: it is something he has had throughout his life, as Chris, but leaves in the Datsun as he becomes Alex.

emory.jpg

Emory Univ

D) Uploaded January 6, 2006 by xinmincat

“…But he had been smitten by the vastness of the land, by the ghostly hue of glaciers, by the pellucid subarctic sky. There was never any question that he would return. During his senior year at Emory, Chris lived off campus in his bare, spartan room furnished with milk crates and a mattress on the floor” (124).

This is a photo of an opulent marble building at Emory University whose windows reflect the beginning of a forest under a vast blue sky. This is by far my favorite of the images that I found for this assignment. The caption discusses McCandless’ return to Emory after road tripping to Alaska the previous summer. It seems that even while at Emory, Chris was anxious to go into the wild and even began living a solitary and somewhat dismal life while still at college. The image is inherently ironic: it depicts a decadent building at Emory, which Chris felt resentment toward, but the windows reflect trees and wilderness, which he longed for. There is also the obvious irony that Chris was living in a room “furnished with milk crates” while attending classes at this prestigious university.

Synthesis)

An applicable (or even seemingly inapplicable) photograph can have a profound meaning on captions from, and the totality of, Into the Wild. While searching for images, many times I had in mind exactly what I wanted the pictures to look like, but during the search found photos that opened the text in ways I had not seen before. An example of this is the photo of Emory University that I used. I had intended to simply find a picture of Emory and discuss the contrast between the lavish college McCandless attended and the rugged journey he chose to take. However, when I found the picture of the building reflecting trees, I began to analyze and try to empathize with Alex’s experience at Emory his senior year and how he dealt with the desire to head north.
A photograph and caption definitely have a mutually causal relationship. When I was browsing photos, I tried to ignore given captions, knowing that they would probably hinder my ability to apply them to parts of Into the Wild. Likewise, after assigning my chosen photos captions, it is hard to see them in any other light besides corresponding to parts of McCandless’ life. This is particularly true of the photo I used to describe when Alex left grease in the microwave. The man’s face in the pictures could be in response to anything, however, I have designated it as definitely being Westerberg upon seeing Alex’s mess. Conversely, this influences the way I see Westerberg’s appearance and immediate reaction, which was not vividly described by Krakauer.
Because of the breadth of Into the Wild, it is very easy to quote it out of context. At the same time, however, many elements of story seem to be asserted, as they are, out of context. This presents an interesting paradox that leads me to believe that, within reason, it is healthy to explore a variety of meanings for much of the story’s content.

“London Calling?”

The latter half of Tuesday’s discussion concerned Jack London’s stories as the impetus for McCandless’ journey. I disagree with this assertion. London may have paralleled the notion of going “into the wild” and the romantic ideals of nature being pure etc. However, I feel that it is Leo Tolstoy, the other author championed by Alex, which was the catalyst for his pilgrimage. The reader is easily thrown off by the emphasis put on War and Peace. Though this is Tolstoy’s most famous work (I personally have yet to muster the endurance needed to read it), other pieces by him, specifically “The Death of Ivan Illych” harbor an ethos that seems more applicable to McCandless and his journey.
Tolstoy’s “Ivan Illych” is a short story about a man who is an honest and diligent worker. Illych’s life is spent in attempt to be successful and lead a “good” life, which he does – he becomes a prominent judge and has a relatively happy family life. Through a series of events however, Illych begins to die. As he is dieing, he begins to examine his life and finds it to be superficial and wasteful and embarks on an introspective journey that culminates in his demise.
Paralleling this, McCandless came from a stable family, went to Emory, graduated with honors, was destined for law school, then leaves it all behind, denounces almost all “material” possessions, and begins a journey that ends in his death.
In the same vein though, I feel it necessary to caveat this with the fact that I see McCandless as crazy (as of now), much the same way I see Tolstoy’s outlook as disillusioned. What is crazy anyways? Two definitions given by Merriam-Webster are “being out of the ordinary” and “being distracted by desire or excitement.” It was McCandless’ desire to leave everything behind and fulfill a selfish goal that distracted him from an “ordinary” life.

Coda – Ironic similarities: Like Into the Wild, “The Death of Ivan Illych” also immediately begins with the main character’s death and then explains the process. Additionally, both characters are involved with the law (Alex was supposed to use the $25K for law school; Illych was a lawyer and then a judge).

Tonight’s(Yesterday’s) Recitation

I found tonight’s recitation to be very intriguing. The contrast of how film and literature each exhibit a point of view was a very interesting concept to analyze.  I had never really considered the differences each struggle with until tonight.

I was disappointed that there was not a discussion about the adaptation of books to films. This seems like it should have been an integral part of the lecture. A juxtaposition of how a book like Fight Club – with such a complex point of view and ambiguous focalyzer – gets adapted to film would be interesting to analyze under the guise of tonight’s lecture. While a book may take four pages to explain the way a scene looks or a character feels, a film has the ability to do this instantaneously. The part of Fight Club, for instance, where Edward Norton realizes that he is Brad Pitt, (which takes several pages to explain) is done in seconds in the film.

I found the interaction between subjectivity and point of view to be extremely provocative. In the philosophical sense, subjectivity is of supreme importance in understanding different perspectives (ontological subjectivity, axiological subjectivity etc.). Likewise, in literature and film, only through acknowledging a character’s outlook – done through the visual or mental understanding of their sense of being – can their role be interpreted purely.

Additionally, I feel compelled to comment on the Columbus clip that was shown. Did anyone else notice how when he first reached land, Columbus knew he had discovered the “new world”? Didn’t Chris think he was in India (hence, Indians)?